From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: restore ip source validation WAS(Re: [tproxy,regression] tproxy broken in 2.6.32 Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:30:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091225.173042.189687657.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1260731716.6167.27.camel@bigi> <20091213.191024.193699730.davem@davemloft.net> <1260785985.6167.29.camel@bigi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ja@ssi.bg, hidden@balabit.hu, kaber@trash.net, hidden@sch.bme.hu, aschultz@warp10.net, tproxy@lists.balabit.hu, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33094 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757488AbZLZBak (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:30:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1260785985.6167.29.camel@bigi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: jamal Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:19:45 -0500 > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 19:10 -0800, David Miller wrote: > >> Don't use binary attachments like that please. >> >> It doesn't end up in patchwork properly, and I need that to >> happen in order to track people's work effectively. > > That was me venturing into git-land. This is how i normally send them: Applied, thanks Jamal. I hope this puts the tproxy regression to rest :-)