From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] ip: print "temporary" for IPv6 temp addresses Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:17:59 -0800 Message-ID: <20091226111759.22a9ebe1@nehalam> References: <4AAEAF37.7020305@hp.com> <4B18144E.7020907@hp.com> <20091203122045.2f6e7cd7@nehalam> <4B18203D.8070309@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Brian Haley Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:58484 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753231AbZLZTSF (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:18:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B18203D.8070309@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:31:57 -0500 Brian Haley wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:41:02 -0500 > > Brian Haley wrote: > > > >> Hi Stephen, > >> > >> Brian Haley wrote: > >>> IPv6 addresses that have IFA_F_SECONDARY set are actually temporary addresses, > >>> hence the IFA_F_TEMPORARY equivalent. Change the output in this case and > >>> allow filtering on the word "temporary". > >> I didn't see this in your current git tree, just pinging you about it. This > >> would apply on top of my dad_failed patch. > >> > > > > I'll put it as well, why did patchwork not see it? > > I can only assume it was my subject line? > > Let me know if I need to re-send as it was based on the other one. > > -Brian This in for 2.6.33 (next version) --