From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Stone Subject: Re: RFC: disablenetwork facility. (v4) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:55:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20091227155545.GB12645@heat> References: <200912271736.GDB17180.OFJHOOQStMFLVF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , David Lang , Oliver Hartkopp , Alan Cox , Herbert Xu , Valdis Kletnieks , Bryan Donlan , Evgeniy Polyakov , "C. Scott Ananian" , James Morris , "Eric W. Biederman" , Bernie Innocenti , Mark Seaborn , Randy Dunlap , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang , Samir Bellabes , Casey Schaufler , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Pavel Machek , Michael Stone To: Tetsuo Handa Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912271736.GDB17180.OFJHOOQStMFLVF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Tetsuo Handa wrote: > I expect that the future figure of this "disablenetwork" functionality > becomes "disablesyscall" functionality. Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not interested in pursuing a generic disablesyscall facility at this time. Michael