From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Security: Add disablenetwork interface. (v4) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:26:18 -0600 Message-ID: <20091229052618.GA23714@us.ibm.com> References: <20091228181357.GB16277@us.ibm.com> <20091229012158.GA14362@heat> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , David Lang , Oliver Hartkopp , Alan Cox , Herbert Xu , Valdis Kletnieks , Bryan Donlan , Evgeniy Polyakov , "C. Scott Ananian" , James Morris , "Eric W. Biederman" , Bernie Innocenti , Mark Seaborn , Randy Dunlap , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang , Tetsuo Handa , Samir Bellabes , Casey Schaufler , Pavel Machek To: Michael Stone Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091229012158.GA14362@heat> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Quoting Michael Stone (michael@laptop.org): > Serge Hallyn wrote: > >Is there any reason not to handle these in > > disablenetwork_security_prctl() > >? > > I'm afraid that I don't understand what you're asking here. Are you just saying > that you'd like me to rename the functions that implement the interface logic > to something that begins with "disablenetwork_"? Sorry, for some reason I was thinking you still had a security_operations *disablenetwork_ops. But you don't, so my comment is silly. Please ignore. > Regards, and thanks for all your help, My pleasure, and thanks for the patience. -serge