From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Improve hash function used for full_name_hash() Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:47:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100104.124711.50820580.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1262635784.8178.253.camel@groeck-laptop> <20100104122912.5f9d1ebb@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: guenter.roeck@ericsson.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48344 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752751Ab0ADUrJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:47:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100104122912.5f9d1ebb@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:29:12 -0800 > On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:09:44 -0800 > Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> For example, when hashing "eth0" .. "eth9999" with a hash table size of 256, >> the resulting minimum hash bucket depth is 0, the maximum depth is 563, >> and the standard deviation is ~136. > > The problem was a missing call to hash_32() on the result, and is > already fixed in current kernel. Added linux-kernel CC: to followup...