netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igmp: fix ip_mc_sf_allow race
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:51:09 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100104185109.GA2706@sysclose.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B41E7F7.2030003@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:07:03PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le 04/01/2010 12:29, Flavio Leitner a écrit :
>  
> > Then, I tried using call_rcu() to avoid the problem you are saying,
> > but when you stop the reproducer, sk_free() will warn printing 
> > "optmem leakage.." because the rcu callback didn't run yet.
> > 
> > 
> 
> This is probably because your call_rcu() callback was trying to call sock_kfree_s() ?

yes, correct.

> 
>  		rtnl_unlock();
> 		call_rcu(&iml->lock, callback_func)
> 
> callback_func()
> {
> 	sock_kfree_s(sk, iml, sizeof(*iml));
> }
> 
> 
> 
> Take a look at sock_kfree_s() definition :
> 
> void sock_kfree_s(struct sock *sk, void *mem, int size)
> {
>         kfree(mem);
>         atomic_sub(size, &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> }
> 
> 
> You can certainly try :
> 
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 	atomic_sub(sizeof(*iml), sk->sk_omem_alloc);
> 	call_rcu(&iml->rcu, kfree);
> 
> (immediate sk_omem_alloc handling, but deferred kfree())

Ok, below is the new version using call_rcu(). I'm still running my
tests here, so I'm planning to resubmit it later if this version is
okay with you.

thanks!

diff --git a/include/linux/igmp.h b/include/linux/igmp.h
index 724c27e..9cccd16 100644
--- a/include/linux/igmp.h
+++ b/include/linux/igmp.h
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ struct ip_mc_socklist {
 	struct ip_mreqn		multi;
 	unsigned int		sfmode;		/* MCAST_{INCLUDE,EXCLUDE} */
 	struct ip_sf_socklist	*sflist;
+	struct rcu_head		rcu;
 };
 
 struct ip_sf_list {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
index 76c0840..ed154db 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ int ip_mc_join_group(struct sock *sk , struct ip_mreqn *imr)
 	iml->next = inet->mc_list;
 	iml->sflist = NULL;
 	iml->sfmode = MCAST_EXCLUDE;
-	inet->mc_list = iml;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(inet->mc_list, iml);
 	ip_mc_inc_group(in_dev, addr);
 	err = 0;
 done:
@@ -1825,6 +1825,17 @@ static int ip_mc_leave_src(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mc_socklist *iml,
 	return err;
 }
 
+
+void ip_mc_socklist_reclaim(struct rcu_head *rp)
+{
+	struct ip_mc_socklist *iml;
+
+	iml = container_of(rp, struct ip_mc_socklist, rcu);
+	/* sk_omem_alloc should have been decreased by the caller*/
+	kfree(iml);
+}
+
+
 /*
  *	Ask a socket to leave a group.
  */
@@ -1854,12 +1865,15 @@ int ip_mc_leave_group(struct sock *sk, struct ip_mreqn *imr)
 
 		(void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
 
-		*imlp = iml->next;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(*imlp, iml->next);
 
 		if (in_dev)
 			ip_mc_dec_group(in_dev, group);
+
 		rtnl_unlock();
-		sock_kfree_s(sk, iml, sizeof(*iml));
+		/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
+		atomic_sub(sizeof(*iml), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
+		call_rcu(&iml->rcu, ip_mc_socklist_reclaim);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	if (!in_dev)
@@ -2209,30 +2223,40 @@ int ip_mc_sf_allow(struct sock *sk, __be32 loc_addr, __be32 rmt_addr, int dif)
 	struct ip_mc_socklist *pmc;
 	struct ip_sf_socklist *psl;
 	int i;
+	int ret;
 
+	ret = 1;
 	if (!ipv4_is_multicast(loc_addr))
-		return 1;
+		goto out;
 
-	for (pmc=inet->mc_list; pmc; pmc=pmc->next) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	for (pmc=rcu_dereference(inet->mc_list); pmc; pmc=rcu_dereference(pmc->next)) {
 		if (pmc->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr == loc_addr &&
 		    pmc->multi.imr_ifindex == dif)
 			break;
 	}
+	ret = inet->mc_all;
 	if (!pmc)
-		return inet->mc_all;
+		goto unlock;
 	psl = pmc->sflist;
+	ret = (pmc->sfmode == MCAST_EXCLUDE);
 	if (!psl)
-		return pmc->sfmode == MCAST_EXCLUDE;
+		goto unlock;
 
 	for (i=0; i<psl->sl_count; i++) {
 		if (psl->sl_addr[i] == rmt_addr)
 			break;
 	}
+	ret = 0;
 	if (pmc->sfmode == MCAST_INCLUDE && i >= psl->sl_count)
-		return 0;
+		goto unlock;
 	if (pmc->sfmode == MCAST_EXCLUDE && i < psl->sl_count)
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
+		goto unlock;
+	ret = 1;
+unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+out:
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2245,13 +2269,17 @@ void ip_mc_drop_socket(struct sock *sk)
 	struct ip_mc_socklist *iml;
 	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 
-	if (inet->mc_list == NULL)
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (rcu_dereference(inet->mc_list) == NULL) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return;
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	rtnl_lock();
-	while ((iml = inet->mc_list) != NULL) {
+	while ((iml = rcu_dereference(inet->mc_list)) != NULL) {
 		struct in_device *in_dev;
-		inet->mc_list = iml->next;
+		rcu_assign_pointer(inet->mc_list, iml->next);
 
 		in_dev = inetdev_by_index(net, iml->multi.imr_ifindex);
 		(void) ip_mc_leave_src(sk, iml, in_dev);
@@ -2259,7 +2287,9 @@ void ip_mc_drop_socket(struct sock *sk)
 			ip_mc_dec_group(in_dev, iml->multi.imr_multiaddr.s_addr);
 			in_dev_put(in_dev);
 		}
-		sock_kfree_s(sk, iml, sizeof(*iml));
+		/* decrease mem now to avoid the memleak warning */
+		atomic_sub(sizeof(*iml), &sk->sk_omem_alloc);
+		call_rcu(&iml->rcu, ip_mc_socklist_reclaim);
 	}
 	rtnl_unlock();
 }
-- 
1.6.2.3


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-30 14:23 [PATCH] igmp: fix ip_mc_sf_allow race Flavio Leitner
2010-01-04  5:54 ` David Miller
2010-01-04 11:29   ` Flavio Leitner
2010-01-04 13:07     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-04 18:51       ` Flavio Leitner [this message]
2010-01-04 19:53         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-05  0:06         ` David Stevens
2010-01-05  6:55           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-05 20:52             ` [PATCH] igmp: fix ip_mc_sf_allow race [v3] Flavio Leitner
2010-01-05 22:36               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-05 23:03               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-06 16:40               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-06 17:10                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-06 18:50                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-28 16:13               ` [PATCH] igmp: fix ip_mc_sf_allow race [v5] Flavio Leitner
2010-02-02 15:32                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100104185109.GA2706@sysclose.org \
    --to=fbl@sysclose.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).