From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fubar@us.ibm.com,
andy@greyhouse.net
Subject: Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] Had to revert bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:38:11 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106.133811.207901772.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B44FC2B.4090505@gmail.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:10:03 +0100
> Le 06/01/2010 19:38, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>>
>> (net-next-2.6 doesnt work well on my bond/vlan setup, I suspect I need a bisection)
>
> David, I had to revert 1f3c8804acba841b5573b953f5560d2683d2db0d
> (bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation)
>
> Or else, my vlan devices dont work (unfortunatly I dont have much time
> these days to debug the thing)
I bet this is the same issue Jay was running into, and he
ACK'd the patch anyways. :-)
This is why I wanted full testing and feedback before committing this
change.
Unless I see a fix in the next day I'm reverting from net-next-2.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-20 23:28 [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2009-11-20 23:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-20 23:50 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 0:05 ` David Miller
2009-11-21 0:12 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 0:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-20 23:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-20 23:53 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-20 23:56 ` David Miller
2009-12-17 21:04 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 1:32 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 5:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 7:56 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-06 18:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:10 ` [BUG net-next-2.6] Had to revert bonding: allow arp_ip_targets on separate vlans to use arp validation Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-01-06 21:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-06 21:38 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-01-06 21:45 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-06 22:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] fix " Andy Gospodarek
2010-01-06 23:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-01-07 8:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-07 8:41 ` David Miller
2010-01-06 22:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2010-01-07 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-07 17:42 ` rps: some comments Eric Dumazet
2010-01-08 0:07 ` Tom Herbert
2010-01-08 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-11 6:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] rps: core implementation Tom Herbert
2010-01-11 9:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-14 4:40 ` David Miller
2009-11-20 23:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-21 0:04 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 8:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-21 9:03 ` Tom Herbert
2009-11-21 9:31 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100106.133811.207901772.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).