From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [RFC] PCMCIA patches for 2.6.34 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:03:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20100106140332.GA5299@pengutronix.de> References: <20100106114531.GA29913@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" To: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:37602 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932165Ab0AFODd (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:03:33 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100106114531.GA29913@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dominik, > here are some patches relating to the PCMCIA subsystem, and intended for > 2.6.34. I'm interested in your input to this patch series. They'll be > sent to the PCMCIA list shortly, with CC to other lists if deemed Looks interesting, I will pull your master(?)-branch this evening and give = it a test. Any hints on what to try/look for especially? Suspend/Resume seems one candidate next to the usual "I'll try a bunch of cards"... Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktEmDQACgkQD27XaX1/VRv0lQCgkT9UIU+bFHdItrIAijhOa/AN iiIAnAgw0RB0iKXZyFhM6EQCoj7sHFkw =hjqS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--