From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmfe/tulip: Let dmfe handle DM910x except for SPARC on-board chips Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:27:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100107.172757.144374579.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100107.010651.18296756.davem@davemloft.net> <1262868111.2377.55.camel@localhost> <20100107184624.GA9534@lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ben@decadent.org.uk, brandon@ifup.org, grundler@google.com, tobias@ringis.se, kyle@mcmartin.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: grundler@parisc-linux.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35000 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280Ab0AHB1t (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:27:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100107184624.GA9534@lackof.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Grant Grundler Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:46:24 -0700 > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:41:51PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The Davicom DM9100 and DM9102 chips are used on the motherboards of >> some SPARC systems (supported by the tulip driver) and also in PCI >> expansion cards (supported by the dmfe driver). There is no >> difference in the PCI device ids for the two different configurations, >> so these drivers both claim the device ids. However, it is possible >> to distinguish the two configurations by the presence of Open Firmware >> properties for them, so we do that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings > > Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler Applied.