From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jarkao2@gmail.com
Cc: mbreuer@majjas.com, shemminger@vyatta.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, flyboy@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 resent] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit()
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:51:35 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100110.135135.237364018.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100109123827.GB4386@del.dom.local>
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:38:27 +0100
> tpacket_snd() can change and kfree an skb after dev_queue_xmit(),
> which is illegal.
>
> With debugging by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
>
> Reported-by: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@majjas.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@majjas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Jarek, if this code path triggers, it will deadlock the
send ring with your changes.
We will now leave the ring packet status in the "SENDING" state.
That's not right.
Then, if the application calls send again, we will just return
immediately since we only make progress if the head ring entry is in
SEND_REQUEST state.
This is really bogus behavior. When the qdisc or mid-layer
drops the packet, we should at least mark the packet state
properly (which is what the current code would does, sans
the "reference SKB after dev_queue_xmit()" issue). And
advance the packet ring pointer.
This way the user:
1) can see that the packet got dropped and couldn't be sent
2) can call send again to try sending the rest of the ring
Fix the use after dev_queue_xmit() issue, but don't change other side
effects which are important for correct AF_PACKET TX ring semantics.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-10 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-09 12:38 [PATCH net-2.6 resent] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit() Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-10 21:51 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-01-10 22:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-11 8:04 ` [PATCH net-2.6 alt.3] " Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-11 22:30 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-11 22:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-11 23:07 ` David Miller
2010-01-11 23:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100110.135135.237364018.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=flyboy@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbreuer@majjas.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).