From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] can: Unify droping of invalid tx skbs and netdev stats Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:55:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100111.155537.166350032.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4B4BB1F9.3010808@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org To: socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B4BB1F9.3010808-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Oliver Hartkopp Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:19:21 +0100 > static netdev_tx_t vcan_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > { > + struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data; > struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats; > int loop; > > + if (unlikely(skb->len != sizeof(*cf) || cf->can_dlc > 8)) { > + kfree_skb(skb); > + stats->tx_dropped++; > + return NETDEV_TX_OK; > + } > + ... > +/* Drop a given socketbuffer if it does not contain a valid CAN frame. */ > +static inline int can_dropped_invalid_skb(struct net_device *dev, > + struct sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + const struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data; > + > + if (unlikely(skb->len != sizeof(*cf) || cf->can_dlc > 8)) { > + kfree_skb(skb); > + dev->stats.tx_dropped++; > + return 1; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > struct net_device *alloc_candev(int sizeof_priv, unsigned int echo_skb_max); Why are you not using the new helper function in vcan_tx()?