From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio_net: Defer skb allocation in receive path Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:48:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20100113224804.GD21686@redhat.com> References: <1261122289.4148.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20091224133749.GB2855@amit-x200.redhat.com> <1262640344.18773.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100104211454.GB21488@redhat.com> <1263236965.11949.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1263416018.29594.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100113205750.GD21445@redhat.com> <1263418421.29594.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100113213736.GF21445@redhat.com> <1263421428.29594.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Amit Shah , Rusty Russell , Avi Kivity , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Shirley Ma Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1263421428.29594.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 23:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Yes, separate patch is best. > > The send side patch is done, I will submit it when this patch has been > reviewed. :) Hey, why wait :) > thanks > Shirley