netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: What protects rcu_dereference() in __in6_dev_get()?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:32:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100114183215.GA16866@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello, Yoshi,

Could you please tell me what protects the rcu_dereference() in
__in6_dev_get()?  I am adding lockdep-based checking to RCU, and
"git blame" said I should ask you about this one.

The current code, rcu_dereference(), assumes that this is protected only
by RCU.  My problem might be any of the following:

o	Some other flavor of RCU protects this, e.g., RCU-bh, which
	would require rcu_dereference_bh().

o	This is called from updates as well as from readers, and
	some lock protects the updates.

o	This is called during initialization, when this pointer is
	inaccessible to readers.
	
Please note that I can add a check to cover multiple possibilities.
For a real example in include/linux/fdtable.h:

	file = rcu_dereference_check(fdt->fd[fd],
				     rcu_read_lock_held() ||
				     lockdep_is_held(&files->file_lock) ||
				     atomic_read(&files->count) == 1);

The first argument is the pointer, and the second argument says that
this may be protected by either RCU (as opposed to RCU-bh, RCU-sched,
or SRCU), the files->file_lock as recorded by lockdep, or by being in
a single-threaded process as noted by the value of files->count.
(Please see http://lwn.net/Articles/368683/ for a recent patch, another
will go out soon.)

So, could you please tell me what protects the rcu_dereference()
in __in6_dev_get() so that I can craft the appropriate form of
rcu_dereference()?

							Thanx, Paul

             reply	other threads:[~2010-01-14 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-14 18:32 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-01-15  5:50 ` What protects rcu_dereference() in __in6_dev_get()? Eric Dumazet
2010-01-15 15:15   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15 15:29     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-01-15 15:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 15:53       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100114183215.GA16866@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).