From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 0/3] vhost_net
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20100115.014357.169328821.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20100114161659.GA28159@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
To: mst@redhat.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59006
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757238Ab0AOJnt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:43:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20100114161659.GA28159@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:16:59 +0200

> These patches have been sitting in Rusty's tree and linux-next for a
> couple of kernel releases already, they are largely unchanged since
> November, besides a couple of bugfixes.  They got Rusty's blessing,
> and I'd like them to go into net-next-2.6 and then 2.6.34.
> 
> The patchset is aganst net-next-2.6, commit 508e14b4a4fb1a824a14f2c5b8d7df67b313f8e4.

Looks ok, all applied, thanks.