From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] e1000: enhance frame fragment detection
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:21:35 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100120.162135.41689739.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100120001511.25175.55030.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:15:38 -0800
> From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
>
> Originally From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Modified by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
>
> Hey all-
> A security discussion was recently given:
> http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/Fahrplan//events/3596.en.html
> And a patch that I submitted awhile back was brought up. Apparently some of
> their testing revealed that they were able to force a buffer fragment in e1000
> in which the trailing fragment was greater than 4 bytes. As a result the
> fragment check I introduced failed to detect the fragement and a partial
> invalid frame was passed up into the network stack. I've written this patch
> to correct it. I'm in the process of testing it now, but it makes good
> logical sense to me. Effectively it maintains a per-adapter state variable
> which detects a non-EOP frame, and discards it and subsequent non-EOP frames
> leading up to _and_ _including_ the next positive-EOP frame (as it is by
> definition the last fragment). This should prevent any and all partial frames
> from entering the network stack from e1000.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Applied.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 0:15 [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] e1000: enhance frame fragment detection Jeff Kirsher
2010-01-20 0:15 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 2/2] e1000e: " Jeff Kirsher
2010-01-21 0:21 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 0:21 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100120.162135.41689739.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).