From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-2.6 PATCH 2/2] e1000e: enhance frame fragment detection
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:15:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100120001558.25175.87922.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100120001511.25175.55030.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Originally patched by Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
e1000e could with a jumbo frame enabled interface, and packet split disabled,
receive a packet that would overflow a single rx buffer. While in practice
very hard to craft a packet that could abuse this, it is possible.
this is related to CVE-2009-4538
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
CC: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 1 +
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
index d6ee28f..d236efa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
@@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ struct e1000_info {
/* CRC Stripping defines */
#define FLAG2_CRC_STRIPPING (1 << 0)
#define FLAG2_HAS_PHY_WAKEUP (1 << 1)
+#define FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING (1 << 2)
#define E1000_RX_DESC_PS(R, i) \
(&(((union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split *)((R).desc))[i]))
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
index c45965a..da5838e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -450,13 +450,23 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
length = le16_to_cpu(rx_desc->length);
- /* !EOP means multiple descriptors were used to store a single
- * packet, also make sure the frame isn't just CRC only */
- if (!(status & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP) || (length <= 4)) {
+ /*
+ * !EOP means multiple descriptors were used to store a single
+ * packet, if that's the case we need to toss it. In fact, we
+ * need to toss every packet with the EOP bit clear and the
+ * next frame that _does_ have the EOP bit set, as it is by
+ * definition only a frame fragment
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!(status & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)))
+ adapter->flags2 |= FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING;
+
+ if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING) {
/* All receives must fit into a single buffer */
e_dbg("Receive packet consumed multiple buffers\n");
/* recycle */
buffer_info->skb = skb;
+ if (status & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)
+ adapter->flags2 &= ~FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING;
goto next_desc;
}
@@ -745,10 +755,16 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq_ps(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
buffer_info->dma = 0;
- if (!(staterr & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)) {
+ /* see !EOP comment in other rx routine */
+ if (!(staterr & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP))
+ adapter->flags2 |= FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING;
+
+ if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING) {
e_dbg("Packet Split buffers didn't pick up the full "
"packet\n");
dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
+ if (staterr & E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)
+ adapter->flags2 &= ~FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING;
goto next_desc;
}
@@ -1118,6 +1134,7 @@ static void e1000_clean_rx_ring(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
rx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
rx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
+ adapter->flags2 &= ~FLAG2_IS_DISCARDING;
writel(0, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->head);
writel(0, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 0:15 [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] e1000: enhance frame fragment detection Jeff Kirsher
2010-01-20 0:15 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2010-01-21 0:21 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 2/2] e1000e: " David Miller
2010-01-21 0:21 ` [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] e1000: " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100120001558.25175.87922.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).