From: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, wd@denx.de,
John Rigby <jrigby@freescale.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, dzu@denx.de,
Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] fs_enet: Add support for MPC512x to fs_enet driver
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:20:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100120122058.1539412b@wker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B561AA3.7040506@freescale.com>
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> > + void __iomem *fec_fun_code;
> > + void __iomem *fec_r_hash;
> > + void __iomem *fec_x_cntrl;
> > + void __iomem *fec_dma_control;
> > +};
>
> Why void and not the specific type?
Ok, I will fix it for using u32 __iomem *.
> > static void set_promiscuous_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct fs_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> > - fec_t __iomem *fecp = fep->fec.fecp;
> > + struct reg_tbl *fecp = fep->fec.rtbl;
>
> Hmm, having something called "fecp" that is a different type than other
> "fecp"s could be confusing.
Ok, I will use 'regp' instead of 'fecp' then.
> > @@ -134,6 +143,20 @@ static int __devinit fs_enet_mdio_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
> > if (!fec->fecp)
> > goto out_fec;
> >
> > + if (of_device_is_compatible(ofdev->node, "fsl,mpc5121-fec-mdio")) {
>
> You can put a data pointer in the of_platform match struct, instead of
> re-checking the compatible.
.data pointer in 'fs_enet_mdio_fec_match' is already used for
mpc5xxx_get_bus_frequency(). Setting .data to some sort of FEC ID in
match struct for "fsl,pq1-fec-mdio" would be confusing to.
Would a simple
if (!strncmp(match->compatible, "fsl,mpc5121-fec-mdio",
sizeof(match->compatible))) {
suffice here?
Thanks!
Anatolij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 20:24 [PATCH 0/11] Update support for MPC512x Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-19 20:24 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs_enet: Add support for MPC512x to fs_enet driver Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-19 20:48 ` Scott Wood
2010-01-20 11:20 ` Anatolij Gustschin [this message]
2010-01-20 17:02 ` Scott Wood
2010-01-19 20:24 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs_enet: Add FEC TX Alignment workaround for MPC5121 Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-19 20:37 ` David Miller
2010-01-19 23:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-20 4:04 ` David Miller
2010-01-20 10:22 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1263932653-3634-1-git-send-email-agust-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-20 11:22 ` [PATCH 0/11] Update support for MPC512x Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100120112232.GD5041-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 8:06 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-26 12:16 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100120122058.1539412b@wker \
--to=agust@denx.de \
--cc=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=jrigby@freescale.com \
--cc=kosmo@semihalf.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).