From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: fix rt_lookup in pmtu_discovery Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:20:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100123.022055.258206634.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100110.131524.241344047.davem@davemloft.net> <55a4f86e1001131651j102b600fm1552a42866c3c671@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: lorenzo@google.com, therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: zenczykowski@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39778 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754748Ab0AWKUn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:20:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <55a4f86e1001131651j102b600fm1552a42866c3c671@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Maciej =AFenczykowski Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:51:30 -0800 > I believe you are looking for the following patch. >=20 > I don't think it solves the problem of source based routing to any > (significantly) greater extent than the previous patch. > That would actually require iterating over all IPs assigned to any > interface on our machine. >=20 > However, I really don't understand the code (nor the precise issues > involved) sufficiently well to be certain of that. >=20 > I actually think the ipv4 code path suffers from a very similar probl= em. >=20 > Mind you - I don't think these issues are really significant problems= , > because they just mean we do PMTU once per (dest ip, src ip) instead > of once per (dest ip). Yes, this is about right. Please resubmit with a proper Signed-off-by: tag so I can apply this, thanks.