From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ajit Khaparde Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] be2net: Bug fix to support newer generation of BE ASIC Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:17:49 +0530 Message-ID: <20100129064747.GA11514@serverengines.com> References: <20100128232829.GA31884@kroah.com> <1264722956.373.561.camel@localhost> <20100129055157.GA10427@serverengines.com> <20100128.215629.189699027.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: Ajit Khaparde Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ajitkhaparde@gmail.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, greg@kroah.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from segment-124-30.sify.net ([124.30.166.146]:35460 "EHLO akhaparde.serverengines.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811Ab0A2Gri (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:47:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100128.215629.189699027.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 28/01/10 21:56 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Ajit Khaparde > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:21:59 +0530 > > > I plan rectify the error pointed by Ben and Greg and spin the patch again and > > resend it. Please let me know if you think otherwise. > > I already made the obvious memset() arg fix in my tree > as I said I would in my reply to Ben's posting. I never saw this mail. Probably its lost for good. It did not even show up on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/43852 Thanks > > It never makes sense to 'respin' patches I've already > applied to net-2.6, once I push it out to kernel.org > it's irreversable so you must send relative fixes.