From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio_net: Defer skb allocation in receive path Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:05:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20100129140553.GA4413@redhat.com> References: <1262640344.18773.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100104211454.GB21488@redhat.com> <1263236965.11949.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1263416018.29594.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100113205750.GD21445@redhat.com> <1263418421.29594.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100113213736.GF21445@redhat.com> <1263421428.29594.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100113224804.GD21686@redhat.com> <1263429475.29594.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Amit Shah , Rusty Russell , Avi Kivity , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Shirley Ma Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27702 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755078Ab0A2OJ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:09:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1263429475.29594.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:37:55PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 00:48 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 23:37 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Yes, separate patch is best. > > > > > > The send side patch is done, I will submit it when this patch has > > > been reviewed. :) > > > > > > Hey, why wait :) > > > > Because: the send side patch is built on top of this patch and uses > free_unused_bufs() func. > > Thanks > Shirley Now that's in, how does the send patch look? -- MST