From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] bond hashing revised Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:04:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20100205130433.16fc307f@nehalam> References: <20100204171118.917737392@vyatta.com> <4B6BE781.7070107@fox-it.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Jay Vosburgh , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" To: Jasper Spaans Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:53911 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757504Ab0BEVEu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:04:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B6BE781.7070107@fox-it.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:40:17 +0000 Jasper Spaans wrote: > On 04/02/10 17:11, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > These have not been tested yet. I need to try them with some > > different flows/hardware to validate. > > > Glancing over these patches, all four of them look fine to me. > > The only thing missing is some documentation in > Documentation/networking/bonding.txt (I have no idea what multiqueue is > supposed to do, but if you tell me I'll volunteer). > Did you look at kernel Documentation/networking/multiqueue.txt?