From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: Null dereference in uli526x_rx_packet()
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 00:15:40 -0700
Message-ID: <20100207071540.GA9908@lackof.org>
References: <20090328024754.GA16554@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090328032332.GA22353@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090329053513.GD19602@colo.lackof.org> <20090328.235931.45430524.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: grundler@parisc-linux.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, error27@gmail.com
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from complete.lackof.org ([198.49.126.79]:33232 "EHLO
	complete.lackof.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751750Ab0BGHPp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:15:45 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090328.235931.45430524.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:59:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
...
> > Patch below looks right to me. Clobbering the skb is certainly wrong.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
> 
> It looks correct to me, can we get a proper submission with
> signoffs etc.?

Dave,
Looks like this patch was never resubmitted.

Kyle, can you look at http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2009/03/27/117
and resubmit the code you had then with my "Acked-by" added please?

Or if you don't want to touch it, let me know and I'll resurrect it.

thanks,
grant