From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: move am79c961's probe function to
 .devinit.text
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20100212.121110.181928763.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1265313417-5568-9-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
	<20100204.120501.110961896.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20100204200638.GA3035@pengutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 12o3l@tiscali.nl,
	rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100204200638.GA3035@pengutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

=46rom: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:06:38 +0100

> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:05:01PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> Date: Thu,  4 Feb 2010 20:56:57 +0100
>>=20
>> > @David Miller: this patch is in patchwork with State: Not Applicab=
le.
>> > Does that mean that netdev isn't the right tree for this patch?
>>=20
>> I was under the impression that someone would pick up the
>> whole set as a unit.
> Ah, OK.  I hope Greg does exactly that now.

I've tossed this into my net-next-2.6 tree anyways to make sure it
doesn't get lost.

Thanks.