From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] ethtool: Move n-tuple capability check into set_flags
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:48:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100212234823.2346.32285.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100212234715.2346.60380.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Peter Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
set_flags should check if the underlying device supports
n-tuple filter programming before setting the device flags
on the netdevice.
Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
net/core/ethtool.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
index fbbe4b4..794cf57 100644
--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -134,15 +134,21 @@ u32 ethtool_op_get_flags(struct net_device *dev)
int ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data)
{
+ const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
+
if (data & ETH_FLAG_LRO)
dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
else
dev->features &= ~NETIF_F_LRO;
- if (data & ETH_FLAG_NTUPLE)
+ if (data & ETH_FLAG_NTUPLE) {
+ if (!ops->set_rx_ntuple)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
dev->features |= NETIF_F_NTUPLE;
- else
+ } else {
+ /* safe to clear regardless */
dev->features &= ~NETIF_F_NTUPLE;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -318,9 +324,6 @@ static int ethtool_set_rx_ntuple(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
struct ethtool_rx_ntuple_flow_spec_container *fsc = NULL;
int ret;
- if (!ops->set_rx_ntuple)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_NTUPLE))
return -EINVAL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-12 23:48 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] ethtool: Fix filter addition when caching n-tuple filters Jeff Kirsher
2010-02-12 23:48 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2010-02-16 5:52 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] ethtool: Move n-tuple capability check into set_flags David Miller
2010-02-12 23:48 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] ixgbe: Cleanup incorrect header comments Jeff Kirsher
2010-02-16 5:52 ` David Miller
2010-02-16 5:52 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] ethtool: Fix filter addition when caching n-tuple filters David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100212234823.2346.32285.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).