From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] ssb: open-code dma_alloc_coherent Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:03:41 +0100 Message-ID: <201002151203.42805.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <20100215142111R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, stefano.brivio@polimi.it, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100215142111R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Monday 15 February 2010 06:21:58 FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > This patch is against -mm since it depends on the DMA API changes in I appreciate your efforts to remove bus-specific APIs. However, always keep in mind that a SSB bus might be running on a system where there's no PCI bus at all. In the past we used the generic dma_... API for DMA operations on all SSB devices. This worked 99.9% of the time. _But_ it broke in really obscure cases where the architecture implementations _slightly_ differed between the generic dma and the pci variants. So, I'm all for it. But simply keep in mind that this has to run on lots of architectures (i386, x86_64, ppc, MIPS, probably more) and it has to run on machines without a PCI bus (where SSB is the main system bus). -- Greetings, Michael.