From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Octavian Purdila Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:48:56 +0200 Message-ID: <201002161248.56598.opurdila@ixiacom.com> References: <1266271241-6293-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com> <1266271241-6293-2-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com> <4B7A5A23.3080309@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Linux Kernel Developers , "Eric W. Biederman" To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from ixro-out-rtc.ixiacom.com ([92.87.192.98]:9744 "EHLO ixro-ex1.ixiacom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752157Ab0BPKw2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:52:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B7A5A23.3080309@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 16 February 2010 10:41:07 you wrote: > > + > > + if (!write && !first && left && !err) > > + err = proc_put_newline(&buffer, &left); > > + if (write && !err) > > + err = proc_skip_wspace(&buffer, &left); > > + if (err == -EFAULT /* do we really need to check for -EFAULT? */ || > > + (write && first)) > > + return err ? : -EINVAL; > > The logic here seems messy, adding one or two goto's may help? > OK, I'll give it a try. What about the EFAULT check, is that really required?