From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vhost: fix get_user_pages_fast error handling Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:37:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20100224053737.GB27806@redhat.com> References: <20100223173434.GB9834@redhat.com> <20100223173258.GA25338@redhat.com> <20100223173952.GC9834@redhat.com> <20100223.144235.08984181.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gleb@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, markmc@redhat.com, herbert.xu@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, dlaor@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100223.144235.08984181.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:42:35PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > Just for the record I'm generally not interested in vhost > patches. > > If it's a specific network one that will be merged via > the networking tree, yes please CC: me. > > But if it's a bunch of changes to vhost.c and other pieces > of infrastructure, feel free to leave me out of it. It just > clutters my already overflowing inbox. > > Thanks. Dave, so while Rusty's on vacation, what's the best way to get vhost infrastructure fixes in? Are you ok with getting pull requests and merging them into net-next? That should keep the clutter in your inbox to the minimum. Of course network changes would still go the usual way. -- MST