From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH] af_packet: move strict addr_len check right before dev_[mc/unicast]_[add/del] Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:01:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20100303020110.hhu4cdecg08kkck0-cebfxv@webmail.spamcop.net> References: <1267578048.14049.11.camel@mj> <20100303064001.GB2648@psychotron.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:50255 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753411Ab0CCHBK (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 02:01:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100303064001.GB2648@psychotron.redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Quoting Jiri Pirko : > @@ -1734,7 +1738,7 @@ static int packet_mc_add(struct sock *sk, > struct packet_mreq_max *mreq) > goto done; > > err = -EINVAL; > - if (mreq->mr_alen != dev->addr_len) > + if (mreq->mr_alen > dev->addr_len) > goto done; > > err = -ENOBUFS; The patch looks good, but did you mean to include this change? It's not described. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin