From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:42:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20100304.004247.10224846.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4B8D4607.8070603@xenotime.net> <20100303.012359.66790294.davem@davemloft.net> <20100304031847.GA22683@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: mingo@elte.hu Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36200 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754583Ab0CDIm2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:42:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100304031847.GA22683@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ingo Molnar Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 04:18:47 +0100 > I suspect Randy went by the MAINTAINERS entry - you might want to add netdev > as a second 'L:' line: > > ETHERNET BRIDGE > M: Stephen Hemminger > L: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org > W: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge > S: Maintained > F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/ > F: net/bridge/ > > To make it really clear that netdev must be Cc:-ed for those patches. Thanks for pointing that out, I've made this addition.