From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Guo-Fu Tseng" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 2/3] jme: Adding lock to protect vlgrp structure. Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:49:45 +0800 Message-ID: <20100316071753.M36702@cooldavid.org> References: <1268630108-10374-1-git-send-email-cooldavid@cooldavid.org> <1268630108-10374-2-git-send-email-cooldavid@cooldavid.org> <20100315.155453.143098808.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: cooldavid@cooldavid.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ethanhsiao@jmicron.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from cooldavid.org ([114.33.45.68]:48715 "EHLO cooldavid.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757156Ab0CPHuE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:50:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100315.155453.143098808.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:54:53 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote > Please respin this whole patch set when you fix this > vlgrp locking the way I told you to. > > Also, please don't submit a seperate series for 2.6.33 it only creates > confusion. Just add a "CC: stable@kernel.org" right after your > signoff line and it'll get sorted out automatically once the patch > reaches Linus's tree. Now I see the "stable_kernel_rules.txt", sorry for the careless. BTW, is it OK if the patch can only apply on net-2.6 tree cleanly, but have some Hunks applying to stable kernel? If it is intended for both net-2.6 and stable kernel. Guo-Fu Tseng