* [PATCH 0/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq @ 2010-03-17 14:33 Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chase Douglas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev I believe an Ubuntu user has found an issue that has been resolved in the -rt patchset for a few years. I pulled the fix from the patchset and built a test kernel for the user, but I've yet to hear usable results back (test kernel isn't booting right, but it may be due to other big changes that went in the newer Ubuntu kernel I gave him). In the meantime, I'm sending this on for folks to take a look at. All useful information can be found in the commit message, including a link to the bug report with a BUG message. -- Chase ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq 2010-03-17 14:33 [PATCH 0/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 14:33 ` Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 18:03 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Last year, threaded IRQ handlers were introduced to the mainline kernel. This change requires the disable_irq function to sleep if any IRQ handler threads for a given IRQ line are running. Back in 2006, while working on the -rt patch set that had threaded IRQ handlers, the vortex_timer function was causing scheduling bugs because it is run in softirq context and called disable_irq. This patch was the best fix determined at the time, and still exists in the .33 -rt patchset. Now that threaded IRQ handlers are present in the mainline kernel we need to apply the patch there as well. http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/12/178 BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533335 Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> --- drivers/net/3c59x.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c index f965431..bdaff0f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c +++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c @@ -1764,6 +1764,7 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data) int next_tick = 60*HZ; int ok = 0; int media_status, old_window; + unsigned long flags; if (vortex_debug > 2) { pr_debug("%s: Media selection timer tick happened, %s.\n", @@ -1771,7 +1772,7 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data) pr_debug("dev->watchdog_timeo=%d\n", dev->watchdog_timeo); } - disable_irq_lockdep(dev->irq); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vp->lock, flags); old_window = ioread16(ioaddr + EL3_CMD) >> 13; EL3WINDOW(4); media_status = ioread16(ioaddr + Wn4_Media); @@ -1851,7 +1852,7 @@ leave_media_alone: dev->name, media_tbl[dev->if_port].name); EL3WINDOW(old_window); - enable_irq_lockdep(dev->irq); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vp->lock, flags); mod_timer(&vp->timer, RUN_AT(next_tick)); if (vp->deferred) iowrite16(FakeIntr, ioaddr + EL3_CMD); -- 1.6.3.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq 2010-03-17 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 18:03 ` David Miller 2010-03-17 18:20 ` Chase Douglas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-03-17 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: chase.douglas; +Cc: netdev From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:33:16 -0400 > Last year, threaded IRQ handlers were introduced to the mainline kernel. > This change requires the disable_irq function to sleep if any IRQ > handler threads for a given IRQ line are running. > > Back in 2006, while working on the -rt patch set that had threaded IRQ > handlers, the vortex_timer function was causing scheduling bugs because > it is run in softirq context and called disable_irq. This patch was the > best fix determined at the time, and still exists in the .33 -rt > patchset. Now that threaded IRQ handlers are present in the mainline > kernel we need to apply the patch there as well. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/12/178 > > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533335 > > Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> This code is very much intentionally using disable_irq*(). The operation being performed here is extremely expensive, and during that time if we have cpu interrupts disabled serial devices will drop characters etc. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq 2010-03-17 18:03 ` David Miller @ 2010-03-17 18:20 ` Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 18:27 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:03 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:33:16 -0400 > >> Last year, threaded IRQ handlers were introduced to the mainline kernel. >> This change requires the disable_irq function to sleep if any IRQ >> handler threads for a given IRQ line are running. >> >> Back in 2006, while working on the -rt patch set that had threaded IRQ >> handlers, the vortex_timer function was causing scheduling bugs because >> it is run in softirq context and called disable_irq. This patch was the >> best fix determined at the time, and still exists in the .33 -rt >> patchset. Now that threaded IRQ handlers are present in the mainline >> kernel we need to apply the patch there as well. >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/12/178 >> >> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533335 >> >> Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> > > This code is very much intentionally using disable_irq*(). > > The operation being performed here is extremely expensive, > and during that time if we have cpu interrupts disabled > serial devices will drop characters etc. If that's the case, what's the solution? It's not safe to call disable_irq* in softirq context anymore. With the patch we have a stable driver that may cause some serial devices to drop characters. Without the patch we have an unstable driver that can lock up. To me it seems the latter is preferable to the former, especially when the lockup is occurs somewhat frequently. -- Chase ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq 2010-03-17 18:20 ` Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 18:27 ` David Miller 2010-03-17 18:44 ` Chase Douglas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-03-17 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: chase.douglas; +Cc: netdev From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:20:45 -0400 > If that's the case, what's the solution? It's not safe to call > disable_irq* in softirq context anymore. That's a huge problem, because such a restriction has broken several drivers. 3c59x is not the only one which uses this technique for this reason. The 8390 one does too. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq 2010-03-17 18:27 ` David Miller @ 2010-03-17 18:44 ` Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 18:47 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:27 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:20:45 -0400 > >> If that's the case, what's the solution? It's not safe to call >> disable_irq* in softirq context anymore. > > That's a huge problem, because such a restriction has broken > several drivers. 3c59x is not the only one which uses this > technique for this reason. The 8390 one does too. So basically the answer right now is: it's broken and needs to be reworked, and a switch to disabling irqs is deemed inadequate. Is that accurate? If that's a fair statement of the current drivers, then I can go back and inform end users of this when they hit the bug. -- Chase ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq 2010-03-17 18:44 ` Chase Douglas @ 2010-03-17 18:47 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-03-17 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: chase.douglas; +Cc: netdev From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:44:30 -0400 > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:27 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: >> From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com> >> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:20:45 -0400 >> >>> If that's the case, what's the solution? It's not safe to call >>> disable_irq* in softirq context anymore. >> >> That's a huge problem, because such a restriction has broken >> several drivers. 3c59x is not the only one which uses this >> technique for this reason. The 8390 one does too. > > So basically the answer right now is: it's broken and needs to be > reworked, and a switch to disabling irqs is deemed inadequate. Is that > accurate? Yep. The bug is whatever caused disable_irq*() to stop working where these drivers have been using it for what feels like a century :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-17 18:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-03-17 14:33 [PATCH 0/1] 3c59x: Acquire vortex lock instead of disabling irq Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 18:03 ` David Miller 2010-03-17 18:20 ` Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 18:27 ` David Miller 2010-03-17 18:44 ` Chase Douglas 2010-03-17 18:47 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).