netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bruce.w.allan@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Subject: Re: e1000e: Fix build with CONFIG_PM disabled.
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:39:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003172339.15494.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100317.111717.85209898.davem@davemloft.net>

On Wednesday 17 March 2010, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:57:59 -0600
> 
> > But then the driver build fails again when CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not set.
> > 
> > drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c: In function `e1000_runtime_resume`:
> > drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c:4807: error: `struct dev_pm_info` has no member named `runtime_auto`
> 
> Ugh, can someone send me a fix for that?

Appended, on top of your patch.  It only moves the code around and adds
#ifdefs.

Thanks,
Rafael

---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Net / e1000e: Fix build issue introduced by runtime PM patch

The recent PCI runtime PM patch broke build for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP undefined.  Fix that by moving the PM callbacks
under suitable #ifdefs.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c |  116 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -4664,58 +4664,12 @@ static void e1000e_disable_l1aspm(struct
 	}
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_OPS
 static bool e1000e_pm_ready(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	return !!adapter->tx_ring->buffer_info;
 }
 
-static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
-	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
-
-	if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (adapter->idle_check) {
-		adapter->idle_check = false;
-		if (!e1000e_has_link(adapter))
-			pm_schedule_suspend(dev, MSEC_PER_SEC);
-	}
-
-	return -EBUSY;
-}
-
-static int e1000_suspend(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
-	int retval;
-	bool wake;
-
-	retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, false);
-	if (!retval)
-		e1000_complete_shutdown(pdev, true, wake);
-
-	return retval;
-}
-
-static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
-	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
-
-	if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) {
-		bool wake;
-
-		__e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true);
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -4783,6 +4737,20 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int e1000_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+	int retval;
+	bool wake;
+
+	retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, false);
+	if (!retval)
+		e1000_complete_shutdown(pdev, true, wake);
+
+	return retval;
+}
+
 static int e1000_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
@@ -4794,6 +4762,41 @@ static int e1000_resume(struct device *d
 
 	return __e1000_resume(pdev);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
+static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+	if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) {
+		bool wake;
+
+		__e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+	if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (adapter->idle_check) {
+		adapter->idle_check = false;
+		if (!e1000e_has_link(adapter))
+			pm_schedule_suspend(dev, MSEC_PER_SEC);
+	}
+
+	return -EBUSY;
+}
 
 static int e1000_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -4807,7 +4810,8 @@ static int e1000_runtime_resume(struct d
 	adapter->idle_check = !dev->power.runtime_auto;
 	return __e1000_resume(pdev);
 }
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME */
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM_OPS */
 
 static void e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
@@ -5475,17 +5479,11 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(e1000_pci
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, e1000_pci_tbl);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_OPS
 static const struct dev_pm_ops e1000_pm_ops = {
-	.suspend  = e1000_suspend,
-	.resume   = e1000_resume,
-	.freeze = e1000_suspend,
-	.thaw = e1000_resume,
-	.poweroff = e1000_suspend,
-	.restore = e1000_resume,
-	.runtime_suspend = e1000_runtime_suspend,
-	.runtime_resume = e1000_runtime_resume,
-	.runtime_idle = e1000_idle,
+	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(e1000_suspend, e1000_resume)
+	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(e1000_runtime_suspend,
+				e1000_runtime_resume, e1000_idle)
 };
 #endif
 
@@ -5495,7 +5493,7 @@ static struct pci_driver e1000_driver = 
 	.id_table = e1000_pci_tbl,
 	.probe    = e1000_probe,
 	.remove   = __devexit_p(e1000_remove),
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_OPS
 	.driver.pm = &e1000_pm_ops,
 #endif
 	.shutdown = e1000_shutdown,

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-17  6:41 e1000e: Fix build with CONFIG_PM disabled David Miller
2010-03-17 17:57 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2010-03-17 18:17   ` David Miller
2010-03-17 20:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-17 22:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-03-17 23:37       ` Jesse Brandeburg
2010-03-17 23:51         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-18  6:11           ` David Miller
2010-03-18  6:12       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201003172339.15494.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).