netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: robert.olsson@its.uu.se, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU problems in fib_table_insert
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:37:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100321213703.GD2517@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100321202525.GA966@basil.fritz.box>

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:25:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I got the following warning at boot with a 2.6.34-rc2ish git kernel
> with RCU debugging and preemption enabled.
> 
> It seems the problem is that not all callers of fib_find_node
> call it with rcu_read_lock() to stabilize access to the fib. 
> 
> I tried to fix it, but especially for fib_table_insert() that's rather 
> tricky: it does a lot of memory allocations and also route flushing and 
> other blocking operations while assuming the original fa is RCU stable.
> 
> I first tried to move some allocations to the beginning and keep
> preemption disabled in the rest, but it's difficult with all of them.
> No patch because of that.
> 
> Does the fa need an additional reference count for this problem?
> Or perhaps some optimistic locking?
> 
> -Andi
> 
> 
> ==================================================
> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> /home/lsrc/git/linux-2.6/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:964 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> 
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> 2 locks held by ip/4521:
>  #0:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff816466af>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1f/0x40
>  #1:  ((inetaddr_chain).rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8107cde7>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x47/0x90

Looks to me like a false positive: If I rememeber correctly, it is OK
to invoke the fib-trie functions either inside an RCU read-side critical
section or with RTNL held.  However, I must defer to the networking guys.
For one thing, things might have changed since I last looked at this code.

But if I am correct, the following patch should work.  If I am wrong,
this patch will instead incorrectly enforce my misconceptions.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

net: suppress lockdep-RCU false positive in FIB trie.

Allow fib_find_node() to be called either under rcu_read_lock()
protection or with RTNL held.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 fib_trie.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index af5d897..01ef8ba 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -961,7 +961,9 @@ fib_find_node(struct trie *t, u32 key)
 	struct node *n;
 
 	pos = 0;
-	n = rcu_dereference(t->trie);
+	n = rcu_dereference_check(t->trie,
+				  rcu_read_lock_held() ||
+				  lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
 
 	while (n != NULL &&  NODE_TYPE(n) == T_TNODE) {
 		tn = (struct tnode *) n;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-21 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-21 20:25 RCU problems in fib_table_insert Andi Kleen
2010-03-21 21:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-21 21:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-21 21:49     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-21 22:57       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-21 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-22  1:01   ` David Miller
2010-03-22  6:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-22  6:18 ` Robert Olsson
2010-03-22  6:51   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-07  6:10     ` Robert Olsson
2010-04-07  6:45       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100321213703.GD2517@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.olsson@its.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).