From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
robert.olsson@its.uu.se, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU problems in fib_table_insert
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:38:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100321213803.GE2517@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269206752.3004.9.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:25:52PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 21 mars 2010 à 21:25 +0100, Andi Kleen a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got the following warning at boot with a 2.6.34-rc2ish git kernel
> > with RCU debugging and preemption enabled.
> >
> > It seems the problem is that not all callers of fib_find_node
> > call it with rcu_read_lock() to stabilize access to the fib.
> >
> > I tried to fix it, but especially for fib_table_insert() that's rather
> > tricky: it does a lot of memory allocations and also route flushing and
> > other blocking operations while assuming the original fa is RCU stable.
> >
> > I first tried to move some allocations to the beginning and keep
> > preemption disabled in the rest, but it's difficult with all of them.
> > No patch because of that.
> >
> > Does the fa need an additional reference count for this problem?
> > Or perhaps some optimistic locking?
> >
> > -Andi
>
> No real changes needed, only a lockdep warning...
>
> Probably a rcu_dereference() should be changed to
> rcu_dereference_check() like we did for __in6_dev_get()
>
> We hold RTNL or rcu_read_lock
>
> [PATCH] net: fib_find_node() rcu check
>
> We hold rcu read lock or RTNL when fib_find_node() is called.
> Shutup lockdep complain.
You beat me to it, Eric. ;-)
So:
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> index af5d897..471fe07 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> @@ -961,7 +961,8 @@ fib_find_node(struct trie *t, u32 key)
> struct node *n;
>
> pos = 0;
> - n = rcu_dereference(t->trie);
> + n = rcu_dereference_check(t->trie,
> + rcu_read_lock_held() || lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
>
> while (n != NULL && NODE_TYPE(n) == T_TNODE) {
> tn = (struct tnode *) n;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-21 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-21 20:25 RCU problems in fib_table_insert Andi Kleen
2010-03-21 21:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-21 21:38 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-21 21:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-21 22:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-21 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-22 1:01 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 6:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-22 6:18 ` Robert Olsson
2010-03-22 6:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-07 6:10 ` Robert Olsson
2010-04-07 6:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100321213803.GE2517@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.olsson@its.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).