From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@sunset.davemloft.net
Subject: Re: Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support.
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:21:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100325172137.GA12751@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d460de71003251011y2d8d1931u683b396f40df4ed1@mail.gmail.com>
On 18:11 Thu 25 Mar , Richard Hartmann wrote:
> I was wondering what the rationale for commit
> e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 is. We upgraded our custom
> image to 2.6.33 recently and found those options to be missing.
>From the diff of that commit:
-What: Multipath cached routing support in ipv4
-When: in 2.6.23
-Why: Code was merged, then submitter immediately disappeared leaving
- us with no maintainer and lots of bugs. The code should not have
- been merged in the first place, and many aspects of it's
- implementation are blocking more critical core networking
- development. It's marked EXPERIMENTAL and no distribution
- enables it because it cause obscure crashes due to unfixable bugs
- (interfaces don't return errors so memory allocation can't be
- handled, calling contexts of these interfaces make handling
- errors impossible too because they get called after we've
- totally commited to creating a route object, for example).
- This problem has existed for years and no forward progress
- has ever been made, and nobody steps up to try and salvage
- this code, so we're going to finally just get rid of it.
-Who: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 17:11 Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support Richard Hartmann
2010-03-25 17:21 ` Nick Bowler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100325172137.GA12751@elliptictech.com \
--to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=davem@sunset.davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richih.mailinglist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).