netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support.
@ 2010-03-25 17:11 Richard Hartmann
  2010-03-25 17:21 ` Nick Bowler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Hartmann @ 2010-03-25 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, netdev; +Cc: davem

Hi all,

I was wondering what the rationale for commit
e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 is. We upgraded our custom
image to 2.6.33 recently and found those options to be missing.


Thanks,
Richard Hartmann

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support.
  2010-03-25 17:11 Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support Richard Hartmann
@ 2010-03-25 17:21 ` Nick Bowler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nick Bowler @ 2010-03-25 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Hartmann; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, davem

On 18:11 Thu 25 Mar     , Richard Hartmann wrote:
> I was wondering what the rationale for commit
> e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 is. We upgraded our custom
> image to 2.6.33 recently and found those options to be missing.

>From the diff of that commit:

-What:	Multipath cached routing support in ipv4
-When:	in 2.6.23
-Why:	Code was merged, then submitter immediately disappeared leaving
-	us with no maintainer and lots of bugs.  The code should not have
-	been merged in the first place, and many aspects of it's
-	implementation are blocking more critical core networking
-	development.  It's marked EXPERIMENTAL and no distribution
-	enables it because it cause obscure crashes due to unfixable bugs
-	(interfaces don't return errors so memory allocation can't be
-	handled, calling contexts of these interfaces make handling
-	errors impossible too because they get called after we've
-	totally commited to creating a route object, for example).
-	This problem has existed for years and no forward progress
-	has ever been made, and nobody steps up to try and salvage
-	this code, so we're going to finally just get rid of it.
-Who:	David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-25 17:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-25 17:11 Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support Richard Hartmann
2010-03-25 17:21 ` Nick Bowler

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).