From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH 1/2] ixgbe: Priority tag FIP frames Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100326.115830.13275287.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100324224500.6653.28216.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, robert.w.love@intel.com, christopher.leech@intel.com To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50476 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753224Ab0CZS6H (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:58:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100324224500.6653.28216.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:45:00 -0700 > From: Robert Love > > Currently FIP (FCoE Initialization Protocol) frames > are going untagged. This causes various problems > with FCFs (switches) that have negotiated a priority > over dcbx. This patch tags FIP frames with the same > priority as the FCoE frames. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Love > Signed-off-by: Chris Leech > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Applied.