netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J�rn Engel" <joern@dublin.logfs.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, romieu@fr.zoreil.com
Subject: Re: [Regression] r8169: enable 64-bit DMA by default for PCI Express devices (v2)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:12:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100326091234.GA11959@Dublin.logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51f3faa71003251756h17374375yd3a5d2acee2ffab9@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 25 March 2010 18:56:03 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> 
> Francois, ping? Is there anyone else that has access to this kind of
> information about these chips?
> 
> It's kind of interesting that there's only been one report of this
> though. Either the affected chips are rare among people testing
> 2.6.34-rc or there's something more to this. Maybe something
> wierd/unusual about Jörn's system?
> 
> Jörn, are any other devices on your system working with 64-bit
> addressing? Try doing this:
> 
> find /sys -name "*dma_mask_bits*" | xargs cat
> 
> Does anything show more than 32?

I've slightly changed the command:
# for i in `find /sys -name "*dma_mask_bits*"`; do echo -n "$i: "; cat $i; done
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/dma_mask_bits: 36
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 36
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.0/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:01:00.0/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:01:00.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.0/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.0/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.1/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.1/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/dma_mask_bits: 32
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/consistent_dma_mask_bits: 32

One device, which should be this one:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 10)

J�rn

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-26  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100315150806.GA15354@Dublin.logfs.org>
     [not found] ` <20100315151041.GA15667@Dublin.logfs.org>
2010-03-15 18:57   ` [Regression] r8169: enable 64-bit DMA by default for PCI Express devices (v2) David Miller
2010-03-15 23:28     ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-16  8:35       ` J�rn Engel
2010-03-16 23:30         ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-16 23:40           ` David Miller
2010-03-26  0:56           ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-26  3:29             ` David Miller
2010-03-26  9:12             ` J�rn Engel [this message]
2010-03-27  1:55               ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-27  6:38                 ` J�rn Engel
2010-03-27 17:46                   ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-27 22:00                     ` J�rn Engel
2010-03-27 11:57                 ` =?unknown-8bit?B?RnJhbsOnb2lz?= Romieu
2010-03-17 20:52         ` Francois Romieu
2010-03-18  9:03           ` J�rn Engel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100326091234.GA11959@Dublin.logfs.org \
    --to=joern@dublin.logfs.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).