From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Add PGM protocol support to the IP stack Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:11:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20100327131138.GD20695@one.firstfloor.org> References: <87tysccjrn.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100322163609.GZ20695@one.firstfloor.org> <877hp4i76d.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100322185310.GA20695@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:53296 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752931Ab0C0NLn (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:11:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:33:07PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Here is a pgm.7 manpage describing how the socket API could look like for > a PGM implementation. > > I dumped the RM_* based socket options from the other OS since most of the > options were unusable. I did a quick read and the manpage/interface seem reasonable to me. You changed the parameter struct fields to lower case. While that looks definitely more Linuxy than before does it mean programs have to #ifdef this? It might be good idea to have at least some optional compat header that #defines. -Andi