From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: [patch] iwlwifi: range checking issue Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:55:00 +0300 Message-ID: <20100328115500.GX5069@bicker> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Reinette Chatre , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , Abhijeet Kolekar , Johannes Berg , Wey-Yi Guy , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: Zhu Yi Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org IWL_RATE_COUNT is 13 and IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is 12. IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is the right one here because iwl3945_rates doesn't support 60M and also that's how "rates" is defined in iwlcore_init_geos() from drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c. rates = kzalloc((sizeof(struct ieee80211_rate) * IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY), GFP_KERNEL); Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c index 54daa38..7d3806a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c @@ -1955,7 +1955,7 @@ static void iwl3945_init_hw_rates(struct iwl_priv *priv, { int i; - for (i = 0; i < IWL_RATE_COUNT; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY; i++) { rates[i].bitrate = iwl3945_rates[i].ieee * 5; rates[i].hw_value = i; /* Rate scaling will work on indexes */ rates[i].hw_value_short = i;