From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 (TAKE 2)] ipv6: Use __fls() instead of fls() in __ipv6_addr_diff(). Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100330.234043.258204728.davem@davemloft.net> References: <201003291600.o2TG05VI032167@94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50938 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932798Ab0CaGkm (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:40:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201003291600.o2TG05VI032167@94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:00:05 +0900 > Because we have ensured that the argument is non-zero, > it is better to use __fls() and generate better code. > > Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Applied.