From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: Added GRO support Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100401.194604.248174632.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1270122573.22693.6.camel@lb-tlvb-dmitry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp-3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eilong@broadcom.com, vladz@broadcom.com To: dmitry@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60263 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758120Ab0DBCqD (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:46:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1270122573.22693.6.camel@lb-tlvb-dmitry> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Dmitry Kravkov" Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:49:33 +0300 > Adding GRO support on top of the HW LRO (TPA) support $(Q#|(B > there is no measurable performance drawback of adding GRO > on top of it, and it allows better performance when LRO (TPA) > is turned off for virtualization or bridging. > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kravkov > Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein Applied, thank you.