From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: patch to improve x.25 throughput negotiation Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100407.213314.156725109.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4BB8C2CA.6040102@Calva.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: john@calva.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: andrew.hendry@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38438 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750746Ab0DHEdM (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:33:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: andrew hendry Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:09:10 +1000 > I have reproduced a few ways. > 1. X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT on the x25_subscript_struct, then call > SIOCX25SSUBSCRIP, then call SIOCX25FACILITIES without setting the > throughput field. Call connect. > 2. No subscrip setting, call SIOCX25FACILITIES without setting the > throughput field. Call connect. > 3. No subcrip, no facilities ioctl, call connect. > > The patch removes the bad facility and makes the router accept the > call for the above cases. > I don't currently have a setup to test both direction throughput negotiation. > > Tested-by: Andrew Hendry Patch applied, thanks everyone.