From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/3 (TAKE 3)] ipv6 mcast: Introduce
 include/net/mld.h for MLD definitions.
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20100407.233712.27089436.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <201004080611.o386BUQx014996@94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51641
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757004Ab0DHGhJ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:37:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201004080611.o386BUQx014996@94.43.138.210.xn.2iij.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:47:16 +0900

Hrm...

This 3 week old date on this patch posting screws up patchwork as it
lists patches in order by email date, and I therefore nearly could not
match things up with the other two patches in this set.

In fact I initially thought patchwork didn't pick up this patch at
all, and it was only able to see the other two.