netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: ssh server etc doesn't work anymore with net-2.6
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:43:13 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100411.144313.71127091.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100411120403.GA20565@gondor.apana.org.au>

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:04:03 +0800

> Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> 
>> After looking at the actual net-2.6 tree I see that it is actually
>> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL that caused this breakage.
>> 
>> The fact that when this was first implemented we didn't use hw
>> checksums on dataless packets might not have been an oversight
>> after all.
> 
> Looks like I was too quick to blame the hardware, the synack
> code can't handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL so this is probably the real
> cause.
> 
> I will send patches to fix this.

Thanks a lot for figuring this out.

I'll put my original patch (with fixed commit log message!)
and your fixes into net-next-2.6

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-11 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-11  9:17 ssh server etc doesn't work anymore with net-2.6 Yinghai Lu
2010-04-11  9:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-11  9:24 ` David Miller
2010-04-11  9:32   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-11  9:33     ` David Miller
2010-04-11  9:43     ` David Miller
2010-04-11 10:09       ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 12:04         ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 21:43           ` David Miller [this message]
2010-04-11 12:15         ` [PATCH 1/3] tcp: Handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for SYNACK packets for IPv4 Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 21:07           ` Yinghai
2010-04-11 22:00             ` David Miller
2010-04-11 12:15         ` [PATCH 2/3] tcp: Handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for SYNACK packets for IPv6 Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 12:15         ` [PATCH 3/3] inet: Remove unused send_check length argument Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100411.144313.71127091.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).