Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] A device for zero-copy based on KVM virtio-net.

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:39:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 April 2010 22:31:42 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:35:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > qemu needs the ability to inject raw packets into device
> > > > > > from userspace, bypassing vhost/virtio (for live migration).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ok, but since there is only a write callback and no read, it won't
> > > > > actually be able to do this with the current code, right?
> > > > 
> > > > I think it'll work as is, with vhost qemu only ever writes,
> > > > never reads from device. We'll also never need GSO etc
> > > > which is a large part of what tap does (and macvtap will
> > > > have to do).
> > > 
> > > Ah, I see. I didn't realize that qemu needs to write to the
> > > device even if vhost is used. But for the case of migration to
> > > another machine without vhost, wouldn't qemu also need to read?
> > 
> > Not that I know. Why?
> 
> Well, if the guest not only wants to send data but also receive
> frames coming from other machines, they need to get from the kernel
> into qemu, and the only way I can see for doing that is to read
> from this device if there is no vhost support around on the new
> machine.
> 
> Maybe we're talking about different things here.
> 
> 	Arnd

mpassthrough is currently useless without vhost.
If the new machine has no vhost, it can't use mpassthrough :)

-- 
MST