From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100415.015158.58248432.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1271271222.4567.51.camel@bigi> <20100414124426.6aee95c3@nehalam> <1271276568.4567.59.camel@bigi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net, xiaosuo@gmail.com, andi@firstfloor.org To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49441 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757499Ab0DOIvy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:51:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1271276568.4567.59.camel@bigi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: jamal Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:22:48 -0400 > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:44 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> RPS might also interact with the core turbo boost functionality on Intel chips. >> Newer chips will make a single core faster if other core can be kept idle. > > how well does it work with Linux? It's completely transparent and should just happen without any BIOS tweaks.