From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] ks8842: Add module param for setting mac address Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100419.001345.48511058.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4BCBF53D.1040800@pelagicore.com> <20100418.233631.115927208.davem@davemloft.net> <4BCBFC62.8010200@pelagicore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38254 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751066Ab0DSHNl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:13:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BCBFC62.8010200@pelagicore.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Richard R=F6jfors Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:46:58 +0200 > On 04/19/2010 08:36 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Richard R=F6jfors >> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:16:29 +0200 >> >>> I posted a new patch where the MAC address is passed via >>> platform data, hope that's an accepted way. >> >> I saw also that you mentioned that there is no real >> way to probe this information. >> >> Therefore I worry that your plan might be to simply >> use some kernel command line or module option somewhere >> else to fill in this platform_device value. >> >> Is that what you plan to do? >=20 > In the lab; yes. > In the end, there will be a flash available to store > system wide parameters. Ok, your long term plan is fine I guess.