From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100419.132318.192086187.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1271452358.16881.4486.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1271520633.16881.4754.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100419.130905.210660275.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42481 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751078Ab0DSUXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:23:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100419.130905.210660275.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Miller Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT) > net-next-2.6 + Eric's port hashing patch, rps_cpus="ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff" > > tbench 64: Throughput 1593.13 MB/sec 64 procs > tbench 128: Throughput 2367.27 MB/sec 128 procs Eric, I think there is agreement that your patch is not a bad idea. Your original posting had whitespace damange in the patch plus I want to see a proper commit message and signoff, so could you please submit this formally? Thanks!