From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mpatocka@redhat.com
Cc: lists.linux-foundation.org@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: crash with bridge and inconsistent handling of NETDEV_TX_OK
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:48:09 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420.164809.78193162.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420.164505.34362726.davem@davemloft.net>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> Reviewing the code further, I found one very weird commit
>> 572a9d7b6fc7f20f573664063324c086be310c42 committed to 2.6.33. What
>> it does, it changes the semantics of ndo_hard_start_xmit(). Prior to
>> the patch, the meaning was --- return zero (NETDEV_TX_OK) --- the
>> skb is consumed by the driver. Returns non-zero --- the skb is left
>> owned by the caller. The patch changes it to return other flags in
>> bits 4-7 and changes the consumed/returned logic.
>>
>> The problem is that there is still plenty of code that compares it
>> against NETDEV_TX_OK to find out if the skb was consumed.
>
> Drivers are not supposed to return those new flag bits, the new flag
> bits as return values exist only in the packet scheduler path.
And BTW, NETDEV_TX_OK is only ever returned by itself, the
flag bits only get set when a non-NETDEV_TX_OK value is returned.
So we really haven't changed semantics at all, NETDEV_TX_OK (which is
zero) and non-zero are the two valid return value cases.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 23:40 crash with bridge and inconsistent handling of NETDEV_TX_OK Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-20 23:45 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 23:48 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-04-20 23:57 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-21 0:00 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 0:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-21 0:15 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 0:23 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-21 1:02 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 1:10 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-21 1:14 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 1:16 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 1:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-21 1:24 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 2:01 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 13:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-29 22:14 ` RCU error in networking (was: crash with bridge and inconsistent handling of NETDEV_TX_OK) Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-29 23:04 ` RCU error in networking David Miller
2010-04-21 1:20 ` crash with bridge and inconsistent handling of NETDEV_TX_OK Mikulas Patocka
2010-04-21 1:22 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 1:24 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100420.164809.78193162.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=lists.linux-foundation.org@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).